Larger Groups of Students Use AI More Effectively in Learning
Researchers at the Institute of Education and the Faculty of Economic Sciences at HSE University have studied what factors determine the success of student group projects when they are completed with the help of artificial intelligence (AI). Their findings suggest that, in addition to the knowledge level of the team members, the size of the group also plays a significant role—the larger it is, the more efficient the process becomes. The study was published in Innovations in Education and Teaching International.
Group projects are an essential and common part of higher education, but there is still uncertainty about what makes teamwork effective.
The situation has become more interesting since the emergence of AI, which students have started to actively use in their studies. Experts from HSE University, including Galina Shulgina, Aleksandra Getman, Ilya Gulenkov, and Jamie Costley, explored how the characteristics of groups—the size and level of participants’ knowledge—affect the outcomes of work when AI is involved.
The study included 196 second-year undergraduate students, 55% of whom were male and 45% female. They had to solve problems as part of a team in a 16-week macroeconomics course. The students were divided into groups of five to eight people with varying levels of knowledge and experience. At first, the students worked independently on tasks. Then, they attended four seminars where they used ChatGPT 3.5 as a group tool. The goal was not simply to receive an answer from the AI, but to critically analyse it, apply economic models from the course, and present a comprehensive solution.
Researchers evaluated the quality of solutions based on the accuracy and detail of students' responses. Teams that not only used AI correctly but also revealed its limitations earned the highest scores, demonstrating a deeper understanding of the material.
The scientists identified several patterns in the use of AI by groups. Firstly, the best results were achieved by teams with members of similar levels of expertise. However, teams with a wider range of knowledge often performed less effectively. This is despite the fact that, in pedagogy, it is often believed that diversity of knowledge can help rather than hinder a team's performance.
Galina Shulgina
‘We were surprised to discover that the wider the range of student grades, the lower the quality of the final decision. This may be because the more prepared students spent time discussing and reaching an agreement on a solution, rather than focusing on the task itself, while less prepared students were unable to fully utilise the AI capabilities available to them. More skilled students are better at interacting with AI, as they can formulate more complex queries, critically evaluate the responses, and use this information to reason through problems,’ explains Galina Shulgina, junior researcher at the International Laboratory of Research and Design in eLearning at HSE University.
Secondly, the data showed a clear positive correlation between a larger team size and better performance when working with AI. Larger teams, with seven to eight members, performed better on average compared to teams with five to six members. Each additional member contributed to the final score, contrary to the common belief in pedagogy that smaller teams are more effective. Scientists argue that larger teams have more intellectual resources and a variety of perspectives, which help them interact more productively with neural networks.
Aleksandra Getman
‘However, this does not mean that efficiency gains will continue infinitely. After a certain point, negative effects may start to appear, such as difficulty in coordination and increased time to coordinate and maintain shared understanding of the task,’ explains Aleksandra Getman, junior researcher at the International Laboratory of Research and Design in eLearning at HSE University.
Despite the need for further research, the authors believe that in order to optimise the use of AI in education, students with similar educational levels should be grouped together in large classes. The researchers suggest that AI could be applied to the study of any subject.
Ilya Gulenkov
‘There is a potential for incorporating AI into group work in any course, regardless of the field of study or level of training. The key task of the teacher in organising such work is to set students’ expectations in advance about how and why AI can be used in their coursework. If students see examples of successful application of AI, then it can become an additional team member in any subject. We observe how students are using more advanced versions of the models (ChatGPT 5, ChatGPT 5 Thinking, etc), and we see great potential for student–AI collaboration. This applies not only to simple, standardised tasks, but also to complex ones that require in-depth understanding, working with multiple sources, and advanced reasoning. The role of students' own expertise in interacting with these models is becoming increasingly important. All models now provide plausible answers, but it is essential to critically evaluate their content,’ says Ilya Gulenkov, lecturer at HSE University’s Faculty of Economic Sciences.
See also:
Banking Crises Drive Biodiversity Loss
Economists from HSE University, MGIMO University, and Bocconi University have found that financial crises have a significant negative impact on biodiversity and the environment. This relationship appears to be bi-directional: as global biodiversity declines, the likelihood of new crises increases. The study examines the status of populations encompassing thousands of species worldwide over the past 50 years. The article has been published in Economics Letters, an international journal.
Scientists Discover That the Brain Responds to Others’ Actions as if They Were Its Own
When we watch someone move their finger, our brain doesn’t remain passive. Research conducted by scientists from HSE University and Lausanne University Hospital shows that observing movement activates the motor cortex as if we were performing the action ourselves—while simultaneously ‘silencing’ unnecessary muscles. The findings were published in Scientific Reports.
Russian Scientists Investigate Age-Related Differences in Brain Damage Volume Following Childhood Stroke
A team of Russian scientists and clinicians, including Sofya Kulikova from HSE University in Perm, compared the extent and characteristics of brain damage in children who experienced a stroke either within the first four weeks of life or before the age of two. The researchers found that the younger the child, the more extensive the brain damage—particularly in the frontal and parietal lobes, which are responsible for movement, language, and thinking. The study, published in Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, provides insights into how age can influence the nature and extent of brain lesions and lays the groundwork for developing personalised rehabilitation programmes for children who experience a stroke early in life.
Scientists Test Asymmetry Between Matter and Antimatter
An international team, including scientists from HSE University, has collected and analysed data from dozens of experiments on charm mixing—the process in which an unstable charm meson oscillates between its particle and antiparticle states. These oscillations were observed only four times per thousand decays, fully consistent with the predictions of the Standard Model. This indicates that no signs of new physics have yet been detected in these processes, and if unknown particles do exist, they are likely too heavy to be observed with current equipment. The paper has been published in Physical Review D.
HSE Scientists Reveal What Drives Public Trust in Science
Researchers at HSE ISSEK have analysed the level of trust in scientific knowledge in Russian society and the factors shaping attitudes and perceptions. It was found that trust in science depends more on everyday experience, social expectations, and the perceived promises of science than on objective knowledge. The article has been published in Universe of Russia.
Institute for Robotics Systems Established at HSE University
As decided by the HSE University Academic Council, a new Institute for Robotics Systems will be established at HSE, and with a strong fundamental base. It will cooperate with relevant departments across the university and engage students and doctoral candidates in research and development (R&D). First Vice Rector of HSE University and Director of the Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge, Leonid Gokhberg, discussed the expected practical results and the framework for cooperation with an industrial partner.
Scientists Uncover Why Consumers Are Reluctant to Pay for Sugar-Free Products
Researchers at the HSE Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience have investigated how 'sugar-free' labelling affects consumers’ willingness to pay for such products. It was found that the label has little impact on the products’ appeal due to a trade-off between sweetness and healthiness: on the one hand, the label can deter consumers by implying an inferior taste, while on the other, it signals potential health benefits. The study findings have been published in Frontiers in Nutrition.
HSE Seeks New Ideas for AI Agents: Initiative Competition Launched
HSE University is inviting researchers and lecturers to present concepts for new digital products based on artificial intelligence. The best projects will receive expert and technological support. Applications are open until December 19, 2025.
Final of International Yandex–HSE Olympiad in AI and Data Analysis Held at HSE University
Yandex Education and the HSE Faculty of Computer Science have announced the results of the international AIDAO (Artificial Intelligence and Data Analysis Olympiad) competition. Students from 14 countries took part. For the second year in a row, first place went to the team AI Capybara, which developed the most accurate AI model for an autonomous vehicle vision system.
AI Lingua Included in Compilation of Best International AI Practices in Higher Education
HSE University has been acknowledged internationally for its pioneering efforts in integrating artificial intelligence into higher education. The AI Lingua Neural Network developed at HSE was included in the renowned international collection ‘The Global Development of AI-Empowered Higher Education: Beyond the Horizon.’ The compilation was prepared by the Institute of Education (IOE) of Tsinghua University with the support of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China and a global advisory committee, which included experts from Oxford, UCL, Sorbonne, Stanford, and other leading academic centres.