• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

HSE Study Reveals Imbalance in the Generative AI Market

HSE Study Reveals Imbalance in the Generative AI Market

© iStock

Researchers at HSE University analysed how effectively the global generative artificial intelligence market converts investment into real revenue, concluding that AI is currently developing faster than it is paying off. The results have been published in the journal Foresight and STI Governance.

In recent years, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has become one of the main areas of technological investment. Companies are pouring billions of dollars in chips, servers, and data-centre infrastructure, expecting rapid economic returns from large language models.

However, market expectations may be overstated. HSE University Academic Supervisor Yaroslav Kuzminov and Ekaterina Kruchinskaia, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Senior Lecturer at the Department of Higher Mathematics, set out to assess the balance of the generative AI market and whether a gap exists between infrastructure investment and revenues from AI technologies.

The authors applied the DEA method—a model used to analyse the efficiency of complex economic systems based on multiple input and output parameters. In this case, the ‘input’ consisted of revenues of AI hardware manufacturers (chips, servers, semiconductors, and data-centre infrastructure), including companies such as AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA. The ‘output’ was the revenue of companies developing and monetising AI solutions, including Sony, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Amazon, and Apple. In essence, the model simulates the AI market at both the input and the output stages, assuming that these players set the main agenda.

The analysis covers the period from 2016 to 2024. Importantly, the years themselves were treated as the units of analysis—although companies typically serve as units in this method. This decision was deliberate: the authors aimed to evaluate the efficiency of AI development overall in each specific year, rather than within individual companies. To test the robustness of the results, calculations were performed both in absolute terms and with adjustments for global GDP. This approach made it possible to assess the relative efficiency of the generative AI market across different years.

The analysis showed that the development of the GenAI market is nonlinear. As generative models emerged and underwent initial commercialisation between 2016 and 2021, efficiency increased. However, beginning in 2021 the trend changed: efficiency indicators declined despite a sharp rise in investment. After a short-term surge in 2023, efficiency again returned to the level recorded in 2022.

Ekaterina Kruchinskaia

‘From a purely methodological perspective, the results suggest that the AI solutions market is developing according to a catch-up model: revenues from software products do not yet compensate for the massive investment in hardware infrastructure. Increased demand for chips and computing power is driven by the development of large language models, but their commercial returns remain limited and do not offset the cost of hardware technologies or further investment in them,’ said Ekaterina Kruchinskaia.

According to the researchers, the current development model strengthens the position of hardware manufacturers but produces limited economic returns, as computing power becomes an end in itself. The market for AI solutions and applications capable of influencing social processes—for example, by increasing labour productivity—faces not only constraints such as the high cost of hardware and training runs, shortages of qualified personnel, and technological limits of the models, but also struggles to generate sufficient revenue, especially when compared with the scale of investment required.

Yaroslav Kuzminov

‘AI is indeed transforming not only the economy and companies’ business models but also everyday social life. This is evident in our daily lives. At the same time, its influence is actually spreading more slowly than it may appear and is less productive than many would like. Many people speak of a bubble in the AI market—a phenomenon not new to the global economy. It would be fair to say that such risks do exist. Our model opens the door to a more practical discussion in this direction. It is important to have not only analytical tools but also an applied plan, and a straightforward one at that. Without improving the efficiency of applied solutions, expanding their adoption and pursuing more balanced investment planning, further positive progress will be difficult,’ noted Yaroslav Kuzminov.

The authors emphasise that studies of this kind are important not only for the academic community but also for businesses, investors, and the development of balanced science and technology policy in the field of artificial intelligence.

See also:

‘Working with AI Solves a Wide Range of Engineering Problems’

Artificial intelligence is a working tool based on a balanced combination of algorithms and engineering. Experts and doctoral students from the HSE Moscow Institute of Electronics and Mathematics explain how AI technologies can improve an application, device, or system, and what engineering tasks are solved in the process.

‘The Peak of Stupidity’ and ‘The Valley of Despair’: HSE Economists Propose an Explanation for the Dunning–Kruger Effect

The Dunning–Kruger effect, which describes a sharp surge in self-confidence among beginners followed by an equally rapid decline as they gain experience, can be explained by the nature of the learning process and the acquisition of new knowledge. This conclusion was reached by Andrey Vorchik of the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences together with independent researcher Murat Mamyshev. They developed a mathematical model of learning and demonstrated how subjective confidence is formed and changes as knowledge accumulates, as well as how teachers can reduce the ‘valley of despair’ experienced by learners.

Toffee and Risk: Scientists Discover Why People Who Crave Sweets Make More Impulsive Choices

Having a sweet tooth may be linked not only to eating habits but also to the way people make decisions. Researchers at HSE University have found that people with a preference for sweet foods tend to behave more impulsively—not because they want immediate rewards, but because they are less willing to tolerate uncertainty. These findings may help improve treatments for addiction. The study findings have been published in Frontiers in Psychology.

Advancing Collaboration: HSE Faculty of Computer Science and Harbin Institute of Technology Hold Joint Seminar

From July 13 to 16, 2026, the Faculty of Computer Science hosted the Russian–Sino Research Seminar on Machine Learning Applications, organised by the HSE Laboratory for Cloud and Mobile Technologies in partnership with the Harbin Institute of Technology (China). A delegation comprising seven students and three university representatives travelled to Moscow to take part in an intensive four-day programme.

Physicists Find a Way to Model Ion Parameters in Plasma in Seconds

Researchers from HSE University and the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT) have developed a set of simple analytical methods for calculating the properties of heavy ions in helium under the influence of a strong electric field. The new approach speeds up calculations of ion mobility and ion–molecule reaction rates by thousands of times while maintaining sufficient accuracy for plasma jet modelling. The findings have been published in the journal Physica Scripta.

A New Section on AI and a Prizewinning Paper: Early-Career HSE Researchers Take Part in IEEE EDM Conference

The 27th IEEE International Conference of Young Professionals in Electron Devices and Materials (EDM) has taken place in the Altai Republic. This year, researchers from HSE University presented the results of their research and were involved in organising a new section on artificial intelligence. A paper by HSE master’s student Rodion Sidorenko was awarded third place in the research paper competition at the conference.

Two Years of Growth or Decline: How to Choose an Investment Strategy

Economists from HSE University, together with colleagues from international universities, have analysed stock market movements over almost a century and proposed an investment strategy that could have delivered returns nearly twice as high as the market average. Their research suggests following a momentum strategy during periods of sustained market growth and switching to a value strategy after prolonged market declines. The study has been published in the Journal of Banking and Finance.

Researchers Reveal Link Between Attention and Communication Difficulties in Autism

Researchers at HSE University have examined how communication difficulties in children with autism are related to brain function. The findings show that not only language networks but also attention networks play an important role. The weaker the connections involved in maintaining focus and switching attention, the more pronounced communication difficulties were. The study has been published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

HSE Initiates Development of Ethical Standard for Anthropomorphic Robots

Beyond technological solutions, the development of anthropomorphic robotics also demands ethical ones. In July 2026, the HSE Institute for Robotics Systems hosted a foresight session dedicated to developing an Ethical Standard for Anthropomorphic Robotic Complexes. Representatives from businesses, government bodies, scientific organisations, and universities gathered to discuss key ethical and legal issues surrounding the development of anthropomorphic robotic complexes. The main outcome of the meeting was a draft of the Ethical Standard.

Scientists Discover Why Some People Wore Masks During COVID-19 While Others Did Not

Why do some people voluntarily follow new rules while others ignore them? Researchers at HSE University have found that the answer lies not so much in people's willingness to cooperate, as previously believed, but in their ability to empathise with others. Empathy proved to be the strongest predictor of whether people chose to wear face masks voluntarily during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings have been published in Frontiers.