Scientists Discover Why Some People Wore Masks During COVID-19 While Others Did Not
Why do some people voluntarily follow new rules while others ignore them? Researchers at HSE University have found that the answer lies not so much in people's willingness to cooperate, as previously believed, but in their ability to empathise with others. Empathy proved to be the strongest predictor of whether people chose to wear face masks voluntarily during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings have been published in Frontiers.
During the pandemic, millions of people had to adapt to new rules: wearing face masks, maintaining physical distance, and limiting social contact. Some followed these recommendations conscientiously without reminders, while others frequently ignored them. For many years, researchers have sought to understand why people respond differently to the same requirements and which psychological traits influence such behaviour.
For a long time, scientists assumed that compliance with social norms was closely linked to a person's general willingness to cooperate. If someone is prepared to sacrifice personal benefit for the common good, they are also likely to be more responsible in following public rules. To test this hypothesis, researchers from the HSE Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, together with colleagues from the University of Zurich, examined behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic, when wearing face masks became one of the most widespread new social norms.
To determine whether this relationship was universal or depended on cultural context, the researchers included participants from two countries with different social traditions. The study involved 135 volunteers from Russia and Switzerland. After excluding incomplete responses and statistical outliers, the final analysis was based on data from 122 participants. The choice of countries made it possible to compare societies with contrasting cultural traditions: people in Russia tend to place greater emphasis on collectivism and interpersonal relationships, whereas Switzerland is generally regarded as a more individualistic society.
During the experiment, participants first took part in a specially designed economic game in which they had to make decisions either in their own interest or for the benefit of the group. Such experiments are widely used to assess an individual's propensity for cooperation. The volunteers then answered questions about their attitudes towards mask-wearing during the pandemic and completed psychological assessments measuring empathy and personality traits, including the so-called Dark Triad of narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy.
The findings turned out to be unexpected. A person's willingness to cooperate with others, as measured through the economic game, had almost no effect on whether they complied with mask-wearing requirements and other public health recommendations. In other words, a participant could readily cooperate in an experimental setting, yet this did not necessarily mean they would behave more responsibly in real life by following measures designed to protect against COVID-19.
Personal characteristics proved to be far more important. The strongest predictor of whether a person would comply with new public rules was empathy—the ability to understand and share the feelings of others and to care about their well-being. The more strongly this trait was expressed, the more likely participants were to report wearing face masks and following other preventive measures.
Oksana Zinchenko
‘We expected willingness to cooperate to be the main factor behind compliance with the new rules, but the results showed the opposite. What mattered much more was a person's capacity for empathy. When people think not only about themselves but also about the well-being of those around them, they are more willing to follow rules that protect society,’ said Oksana Zinchenko, Senior Research Fellow at the HSE Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience and one of the study's authors.
This pattern remained consistent regardless of participants' age, level of education, health status, the presence of chronic conditions, or other personal characteristics. In other words, empathy—not socio-demographic factors—was the strongest predictor of people's willingness to comply with the new rules.
The study also revealed interesting cultural differences. On average, Russian participants contributed more resources to the common fund in the economic game than their Swiss counterparts, demonstrating more generous cooperative behaviour. However, this did not translate into higher compliance with public health measures in everyday life. Overall, the frequency of mask-wearing was broadly similar in the two countries.
The reasons behind this behaviour, however, differed. Participants from Switzerland were more likely to report that they would comply with the rules if required to do so by the authorities, and they also expressed greater trust in information about COVID-19. Russian participants, by contrast, showed stronger emotional engagement with the pandemic.
The findings may help improve public communication during future epidemics and other emergency situations. According to the authors, people are more effectively motivated by explaining how following public health measures helps protect others—especially those who are most vulnerable—than by relying on prohibitions or the threat of punishment. In the researchers' view, concern for other people is more likely to encourage voluntary compliance with public rules.
The study was conducted with support from HSE University’s Basic Research Programme.
See also:
Biologists Discover 'Molecular Fingerprint' of Preeclampsia
Researchers at HSE University employed a new method to model hypoxia in placental cells during pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and identified molecular markers of tissue hypoxia. Since hypoxia is one of the key mechanisms underlying preeclampsia, these findings are important for a more accurate and timely diagnosis of the disease and for the development of effective treatment methods. The paper has been published in Placenta.
‘Hedgehog’ Versus ‘Relatives’: Researchers Measure How the Brain Responds to Unexpected Words During Natural Speech
Russian neurophysiologists, including researchers from HSE University, have demonstrated the feasibility of using event-related fields (ERFs) to study brain activity during natural speech perception. The researchers showed that this approach can be applied not only to individual words but also to continuous speech. Their findings indicate that words whose meanings differ significantly from the preceding context require longer processing times. The study also reveals that the brain processes function words in two stages: first, it identifies their grammatical role and then uses this information to predict the next word. The study has been published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
HSE Researchers Create New Corpus of Early Child Speech in Russian
Researchers at the HSE Centre for Language and Brain have presented RusLan-M, an open multimedia corpus that makes it possible to trace the development of early child speech in Russian from first words to the emergence of complex grammatical constructions. The database contains around 41 hours of video recordings and more than 35,000 child utterances. The new resource will help researchers study more precisely how children acquire Russian and, in the longer term, develop more reliable tools for assessing speech development. The study has been published in Language Resources and Evaluation.
Scientists Develop Algorithm for More Reliable Processors in Data Centres
Researchers from HSE MIEM and Samara University have developed the LRF-3D algorithm to automatically bypass idle nodes in three-dimensional networks-on-chip. Thanks to its hierarchical architecture, the algorithm outperforms existing solutions in both speed and path accuracy, improving processor reliability for use in data centres, supercomputers, and AI computing. The source code and test results are publicly available.
Researchers Rank Recommendation Algorithms Using Sports Tournament Model
Researchers from the AI and Digital Science Institute at the HSE Faculty of Computer Science have developed an approach for selecting recommendation algorithms more effectively. Their approach uses pairwise comparisons of algorithms to create a tournament table, with the overall ranking based on their performance across all datasets in the tournament. This can reduce the number of algorithms that need to be tested when developing new services, saving both time and money. The study was presented at the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2026).
Researchers Develop Method for Direct Generation of Regulatory DNA
Researchers at HSE University have developed a model for generating promoters and enhancers—DNA sequences that regulate gene activity. The model works directly with DNA nucleotides, without first transforming them into a continuous numerical representation. This solution could be useful for applications in synthetic biology and gene therapy. The study results were presented at the ICLR 2026 Workshop ‘Generative AI in Genomics (Gen^2): Barriers and Frontiers.’
Researchers at HSE University and Sber Train Neural Networks to Better Predict User Preferences
The HSE FCS AI and Digital Science Institute and Sber have introduced a new architecture for recommendation systems that combines two classes of models, enabling algorithms to better predict users’ interests and needs. A preprint of the paper has been published on arxiv.org and presented at Urban ML.
Physicists Discover What Happens Inside a Stable Vortex
Large vortices with characteristic spiral arms are often observed in the atmosphere and the ocean. Physicists from HSE University have explained how these structures form and why they retain their shape. The researchers found that velocities at points located along the same vortex arc remain correlated even over long distances. At the same time, this correlation weakens rapidly with increasing distance from the vortex centre. These differences help explain the formation of spiral arms and may improve models of atmospheric and oceanic currents. The findings have been published in Physical Review Fluids.
‘The Peak of Stupidity’ and ‘The Valley of Despair’: HSE Economists Propose an Explanation for the Dunning–Kruger Effect
The Dunning–Kruger effect, which describes a sharp surge in self-confidence among beginners followed by an equally rapid decline as they gain experience, can be explained by the nature of the learning process and the acquisition of new knowledge. This conclusion was reached by Andrey Vorchik of the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences together with independent researcher Murat Mamyshev. They developed a mathematical model of learning and demonstrated how subjective confidence is formed and changes as knowledge accumulates, as well as how teachers can reduce the ‘valley of despair’ experienced by learners.
Toffee and Risk: Scientists Discover Why People Who Crave Sweets Make More Impulsive Choices
Having a sweet tooth may be linked not only to eating habits but also to the way people make decisions. Researchers at HSE University have found that people with a preference for sweet foods tend to behave more impulsively—not because they want immediate rewards, but because they are less willing to tolerate uncertainty. These findings may help improve treatments for addiction. The study findings have been published in Frontiers in Psychology.